Hibernatning RAM
Jose Celestino
japc at co.sapo.pt
Sat Mar 15 15:39:12 PDT 2008
Words by John McCabe-Dansted [Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 01:35:40AM +0900]:
> On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Jose Celestino <japc at co.sapo.pt> wrote:
> > Wouldn't you save more power if you use your memory as cache (for
> > filesystem, for instance) than simply shutting it down (even if that's
> > possible, i don't know)?
>
> According to this:
> http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/05/30/the_power_saving_guide/page6.html
> a pair of DIMMs required 8 watts, while spinning up a harddisk took
> 8-9 watts. YMMV, but it seems plausible that shutting down the memory
> would save power, even if the cache was moderately effective.
>
Oh, that's a helluva lot. I see the point.
--
Jose Celestino
----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.msversus.org/ ; http://techp.org/petition/show/1
http://www.vinc17.org/noswpat.en.html
----------------------------------------------------------------
"If you would have your slaves remain docile, teach them hymns."
-- Ed Weathers ("The Empty Box")
More information about the Power
mailing list