does hpet help save the power ?
Alexey Fisher
bug-track at fisher-privat.net
Sun May 20 07:27:03 PDT 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I made a mistake in my last post.
So the lowest state with PIT is C4
C0 1,9%
C1 0%
C2 0%
C3 0%
C4 98,1%
Are the any workaround with HPET? or this is not a bug and there is
better to use PIT?
Regards
Alex
>
> the difference PIT with HPET on lowest usage for CPU are conservations
> states,
> for PIT it looks like:
> C0 1,9%
> C1 0%
> C2 0%
> C3 98,1%
>
> for HPET:
> C0 0%
> C1 0%
> C2 36,5%
> C3 40,7%
> C4 22,8%
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFGUFq3VVCoNUmKuAcRAgj+AKDDqup4VfVjxS2yrIYwhe6A6IJ0uACgwAy2
n3IgewfSvXeN3xm/0/S9Usc=
=yVTu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Power
mailing list