lowering the FSB
Peter Ganzhorn
peter.ganzhorn at googlemail.com
Sun Jul 22 11:50:42 PDT 2007
If you don't need the power, why not buy a CPU that is designed to save
power such as the VIA C3? Or are there any recent Intel CPUs for
Desktops designed to save power?
BTW: There is no difference between GMA-3100 or X3100...but I think for
Desktop boards the integrated graphics chip from Intel is called X3000
and is faster than the "mobile" X3100.
Peter
Jan Willies wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm about to buy a new PC which will be running 24/7. Currently I have
> the Core2 Duo E6550 (2,33 GHz, 4 MB, 1333 MHz FSB) in mind but I'm a bit
> nervous about the huge FSB speed. The system will spend most of the time
> doing nothing and I'd like to save as much power as possible in that
> state.
> I don't think Linux-PHC will help me much, because it can't set a lower
> voltage than the lowest standard voltage on C2Ds. It only saves power
> when reducing the voltages of every higher clockspeed down to the
> lowest, but that doesn't apply in my case since the CPU is idle most of
> the time. (I'll try it anyway)
>
> Another approach would be to lower the FSB. Is it possible from Linux
> without rebooting? I read about the lfsb utility on sourceforge but the
> last release is two years old, I wonder if there's something new.
>
>
> Any hints are greatly appreciated.
>
>
> regards,
> jan
>
> PS. The mainboard I plan to buy is the Intel DG33BU, which I hope is
> supported well from Linux, although I'm not quite sure how big the
> GMA-3100 <-> X3100 difference is (no gaming, just video playback and
> compiz).
>
> _______________________________________________
> Power mailing list
> Power at bughost.org
> http://www.bughost.org/mailman/listinfo/power
>
More information about the Power
mailing list